Mental Health in the Age of Algorithms: Examining the Behavioral Consequences of Human Interaction with Intelligent Digital Platforms

Authors

  • Ali Ahmadi Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Mental health, recommendation algorithms, digital platforms, user behavior, personalization, digital self-regulation, algorithmic literacy

Abstract

This study aimed to explain users’ lived experiences of the behavioral and psychological consequences of continuous interaction with intelligent digital platforms and to identify the mechanisms through which algorithmic personalization influences attention, emotion, identity, social relationships, and digital self-regulation. This qualitative study employed an inductive thematic analysis. The participants were 24 adult users residing in Tehran who were selected through purposive maximum-variation sampling and had used platforms incorporating recommendation systems on a daily basis for at least two years. Data were collected exclusively through individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved; preliminary saturation occurred during the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted to confirm the stability and comprehensiveness of the categories. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with the assistance of NVivo software. Analysis involved familiarization with the data, generation of initial codes, development and review of themes, and definition and naming of the final themes. Member checking, peer review, maintenance of an audit trail, maximum-variation sampling, and reflexive documentation were used to enhance credibility and dependability. Five main categories were identified: “algorithmic capture of attention and the development of compulsive use,” “emotional fluctuation, social comparison, and psychological fatigue,” “identity reconstruction in the algorithmic mirror,” “the duality of social connectedness and perceived loneliness,” and “algorithmic awareness, resistance, and restoration of agency.” Participants did not experience themselves as merely passive recipients of technology. Instead, they described a reciprocal feedback cycle in which user behavior trained the algorithm, while algorithmically selected outputs subsequently influenced users’ moods, preferences, decisions, and future behaviors. Intelligent platforms may simultaneously facilitate belonging, learning, identity expression, and access to social or psychological support while threatening mental health through engagement-oriented design, repeated exposure to emotionally arousing content, social comparison, sleep disruption, and reduced perceived control. Therefore, the quality and context of interaction, the nature of recommended content, and users’ degree of transparency and control may be more informative than screen time alone. Algorithmic literacy, well-being-oriented platform design, meaningful user control over recommendations, and digital self-regulation interventions are required to reduce harm while preserving the psychosocial benefits of digital participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, O., Walsh, E. I., Dawel, A., Alateeq, K., Espinoza Oyarce, D. A., & Cherbuin, N. (2024). Social media use, mental health and sleep: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 367, 701–712.

Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676.

Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Eg, R., Demirkol Tønnesen, Ö., & Tennfjord, M. K. (2023). A scoping review of personalized user experiences on social media: The interplay between algorithms and human factors. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 9, 100253.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

Hunt, M. G., Marx, R., Lipson, C., & Young, J. (2018). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768.

Kelly, C. A., & Sharot, T. (2025). Web-browsing patterns reflect and shape mood and mental health. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(1), 133–146.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Matias, J. N. (2023). Influencing recommendation algorithms to reduce the spread of unreliable news by encouraging humans to fact-check articles, in a field experiment. Scientific Reports, 13, 11715.

Milli, S., Carroll, M., Wang, Y., Pandey, S., Zhao, S., & Dragan, A. D. (2025). Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive content on social media. PNAS Nexus, 4(3), pgaf062.

Naslund, J. A., Bondre, A., Torous, J., & Aschbrenner, K. A. (2020). Social media and mental health: Benefits, risks, and opportunities for research and practice. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 5(3), 245–257.

Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Neubaum, G. (2023). Attitudinal and behavioral correlates of algorithmic awareness among German and U.S. social media users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(5), zmad035.

Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age—Facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336–348.

Orben, A., Meier, A., Dalgleish, T., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2024). Mechanisms linking social media use to adolescent mental health vulnerability. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3, 407–423.

Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), e2024292118.

Shannon, H., Bush, K., Villeneuve, P. J., Hellemans, K. G. C., & Guimond, S. (2022). Problematic social media use in adolescents and young adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mental Health, 9(4), e33450.

Taylor, S. H., & Chen, Y. A. (2024). The lonely algorithm problem: The relationship between algorithmic personalization and social connectedness on TikTok. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae017.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.

Valkenburg, P. M., Meier, A., & Beyens, I. (2022). Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 58–68.

Virós-Martín, C., Montaña-Blasco, M., & Jiménez-Morales, M. (2024). Can’t stop scrolling! Adolescents’ patterns of TikTok use and digital well-being self-perception. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1444.

Yesilada, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Systematic review: YouTube recommendations and problematic content. Internet Policy Review, 11(1), 1–22.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published

How to Cite

Ahmadi, A. (2025). Mental Health in the Age of Algorithms: Examining the Behavioral Consequences of Human Interaction with Intelligent Digital Platforms. Behavioral and Social Studies in Mental Health, 1(1), 62-80. https://jbssmh.com/index.php/jbssmh/article/view/14